SECTION
				II
			 CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD

     "Constructive fraud: A contract or act, which, not originating in
     evil design and contrivance to perpetuate a positive fraud or
     injury upon other persons, yet, by its necessary tendency to
     deceive or mislead them, or to violate a public or private
     confidence, or to impair or injure public interest, is deemed
     equally reprehensible with positive fraud, and therefore is
     prohibited by law, ... " Bovier's Law Dictionary - 1856 Edition

     1.   The United States went "Bankrupt" in 1933 and was declared so
     by President Roosevelt by Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111, and
     Executive Order 6260, (See: Senate Report 93-549, pages 187 & 594)
     under the "Trading With The Enemy Act" (Sixty-Fifth Congress,
     Sess. I, Chs. 105, 106, October 6, 1917), and as codified at 12
     U.S.C.A. 95a.

     2    The several States of the Union then pledged the faith and
     credit thereof to the aid of the National Government, and formed
     numerous committees, such as the "Council of State Governments",
     "Social Security Administration", etc., to purportedly deal with
     the contrived economic "Emergency" caused by the bankruptcy.
     These Organizations operated under the "Declaration of
     Interdependence" of January 22, 1937, and published some of their
     activities in "The Book of the States."

     NOTE:  The Council of State Governments has now been absorbed into
     such things as the "National Conference of Commissioners on
     Uniform State Laws", whose Headquarters Office is located at 676
     North St.  Clair Street, Suite 1700, Chicago, Illinois 60611, and
     "all" being "members of the Bar", and operating under a different
     "Constitution and by-laws" has promulgated, lobbied for, passed,
     adjudicated and ordered the implementation and execution of their
     purported statutory provisions, to "help implement international
     treaties of the United States or where world uniformity would be
     desirable."  (See: 1990/1991 Reference Book, National Council of
     Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, pg. 2)  This is apparently
     what Robert Bork meant when he wrote "we are governed not by law
     or elected representatives but by an unelected, unrepresentative,
     unaccountable committee of lawyers applying no will but their
     own."  (See: The Tempting Of America, Robert H. Bork, pg.  130)

     3    In view of Robert H. Bork's statement, it is more than worthy
     of note that there is an "original" 13th Amendment to the U.S.
     Constitution called the "Title of Nobility" Amendment that reads:

     "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive
     or retain any title of nobility or honor, or shall, without the
     consent of congress, accept and retain any present, pension,
     office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king,
     prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen
     of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office
     of trust or profit under them, or either of them."

     4    In January, 1810, Senator Reed proposed the "Title of
     Nobility" Amendment (History of Congress, Proceedings of the
     Senate, p. 529-530). On April 27, 1810, the Senate voted to pass
     this 13th Amendment by a vote of 26 to 1; the House resolved in
     the affirmative 87 to 3; and the resolve was sent to the States
     for ratification: By Dec. 10, 1812, twelve of the required
     thirteen States had ratified as follows:  Maryland,  Dec. 25,
     1810; Kentucky, Jan. 31, 1811; Ohio, Jan. 31, 1811; Delaware, Feb.
     2,  1811;  Pennsylvania, Feb. 6, 1811; New Jersey, Feb. 13, 1811;
     Vermont, Oct. 24, 1811; Tennessee, Nov.  21, 1811; Georgia, Dec.
     13, 1811; North Carolina, Dec. 23, 1811; Massachusetts, Feb. 27,
     1812;New Hampshire, Dec. 10, 1812. Before a thirteenth State could
     ratify, the War of 1812 broke out and interupted this very rapid
     move for ratification.

     No record has been found that the State of Connecticut ever acted
     to either accept or reject  this original 13th Amendment. Yet, it
     was published  in three separate editions of  "The Public Statute
     Laws of the State of Connecticut" as a part of the U.S.
     Constitution in 1821, 1824 and 1835. Then, without record or
     explanation, it mysteriously disappeared from subsequent editions
     prior to the Civil War between the states.  However, printing by a
     legislature is prima facie evidence of ratification, and it has
     been found to have been printed as part of the Constitution in
     this and many other states until around the Civil War period -
     when it mysteriously disappeared from subsequent printings.  It
     was found to have been printed by the legislature of this State in
     the following: 1821 - The Public Statute Laws of the State of
     Connecticut, as revised and enacted by the General Assembly in
     May, 1821 pg. 19 1824 - The Public Statute Laws of the State of
     Connecticut, as revised and enacted by the General Assembly in
     May, 1824  pg.18-19 1835 - The Public Statute Laws of the State of
     Connecticut, compiled in obedience to a resolve of the General
     Assembly passed May, 1835, to which is prefixed the Declaration of
     Independence & Constitution of the United States and the State of
     Connecticut, published by the authority of the State of
     Connecticut.  The Marginal note in all three publications reads:
     "Citizenship forfeited by the acceptance, from a foreign power, of
     any title of nobility, office or emolument of any kind, &c." The
     prima facie evidence of ratification of this Amendment is
     overwhelming.  Since the creditors of this bankruptcy are foreign
     powers and this "unacountable committee of lawyers'" spoken of by
     Robert H. Bork have accepted and retained the "office of  trustee"
     for these creditors and foreign powers, their  Citizenship has
     been forfeited by this acceptance.

     5    The Reorganization of the bankruptcy is located in Title 5 of
     the United States Code Annotated. The "Explanation" at the
     beginning of 5 U.S.C.A. is most informative reading.  The
     "Secretary of Treasury" was appointed as the "Receiver" in
     Bankruptcy.  (See: Reorganization Plan No. 26, 5 U.S.C.A. 903,
     Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5967)  Since a
     bankrupt loses control over his business, this appointment to the
     "Office of Receiver" in bankruptcy had to have been made by the
     "creditors" who are "foreign powers or principals".

     6    The United States as Corporator, (22 U.S.C.A. 286E, et seq.)
     and "State" (C.R.S. 24-36- 104, C.R.S.  24-60-1301(h)) had
     declared "Insolvency."  (See: 26 I.R.C.  165(g)(1), U.C.C.
     1-201(23), C.R.S. 39-22--103.5, Westfall vs.  Braley, 10 Ohio 188,
     75 Am. Dec. 509, Adams vs. Richardson, 337 S.W.  2d 911; Ward vs.
     Smith, 7 Wall. 447) A permanent state of "Emergency" was
     instituted, formed and  erected within the Union through the
     contrivance, fraud and avarice of the International Financial
     Institutions, Organizations, Corporations and Associations,
     including the Federal Reserve, their "fiscal and depository agent"
     -- whose member banks are "privately owned corporations". 22
     U.S.C.A. 286d

7    The government, by becoming a corporator, (See:  22 U.S.C.A. 286e)
     lays down its sovereignty and takes on that of a private citizen.
     It can exercise no power which is not derived from the corporate
     charter.  (See: The Bank of the United States vs. Planters Bank of
     Georgia, 6 L.  Ed. (9 Wheat) 244, U.S. vs. Burr, 309 U.S. 242)
     The real party in interest is not the de jure "United States of
     America" or "State", but "The Bank" and "The Fund."  (22 U.S.C.A.
     286, et seq., C.R.S.  11-60-103)  The acts committed under fraud,
     force and seizures are many times done under "Letters of Marque
     and Reprisal" i.e. "recapture." (See: 31 U.S.C.A. 5323)

		   THE BANKRUPTCY HAS NEVER ENDED!

     8    On March 17, 1993, on page 1303 of Volume 33 of the
     Congressional Record, Congressman Traficant stated:  "Mr. Speaker,
     We are now here in Chapter 11.  Members of Congress are official
     trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any
     bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S. Government."

     9    This is an amazing confession as it applies, not only to
     "Members of Congress," but also to the Secretary of the Treasury
     as the "Receiver in bankruptcy" and to all state and federal
     "officials" who act under the de facto authority of  that bankrupt
     Foreign Corporation known as the United States as trustees
     (foreign agents) for foreign principals.  Trustees work for the
     creditors of a bankruptcy and are agents for foreign principals.
     In this case the creditors are the Federal Reserve Banks, the
     International Monetary Fund (the Fund) and the International Bank
     for Reconstruction and Development (the Bank).

     10  It is worthy of note that an Attorney/Representative is
     required to file a "Foreign Agents Registration Statement"
     pursuant to 22 U.S.C.A.  611c(1)(iv) & 612), when representing the
     interests of a Foreign Principal or Power. (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 613,
     Rabinowitz vs. Kennedy, 376 U.S. 605, 11 L. Ed. 2d 940, 18
     U.S.C.A. 219 & 951)

     11  The contrived "emergency" has created numerous abuses and
     usurpations, and abridgments of delegated Powers and Authority as
     clearly stated in Senate Report 93-549 (1973):

       "A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of
     their lives under emergency rule.  For 40 years, [64 years now]
     freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the
     Constitution have in  varying degrees been abridged by laws
     brought into force by statutes of national emergency."

     12  According to 16 American jurisprudence, 2nd Edition, Sections
     71 and 82, no "emergency" justifies a violation of any
     Constitutional provision.  Arguendo, "Supremacy Clause" and
     "Separation of Powers".  It is clearly admitted in Senate Report
     No.  93-549 that abridgment has occurred.

				 FRAUD

     13  On March 6, 1933 the federal government got the Conference of
     Governors to pledge the faith and credit of the several States of
     the Union and their citizenry to the aid of the National
     Government, (see pp. 18 - 24  of The Public Papers And Addresses
     of Franklin Roosevelt, Volume II, The Year Of Crisis, March 6,
     1933) for what they openly admitted to doing. They encouraged the
     President to ask for and use extra-constitutional powers during
     the "emergency"  that continues to this day.

     "Emergency does not create power.  Emergency does not increase
     granted power or remove or diminish restrictions imposed upon
     power granted or reserved.  The Constitution was adopted IN a
     period of grave emergency.  Its grants of power to the Federal
     Government and its limitations of  the power of the States were
     determined in the light of emergency and they are NOT altered by
     emergency." [Emphasis added] Home Building & Loan Assoc. v
     Blaisdell 290 US 426 (1934)

     "The Constitution of the United States is a LAW for rulers and
     people equally in war and peace,  and covers with the shield of
     its protection ALL classes of men, at ALL times, and under ALL
     circumstances. No doctrine, involving more pernicious
     consequences, was EVER invented by the wit of man than that any of
     its provisions can be suspended during any of the great exigencies
     of  the government. Such a doctrine leads directly to anarchy or
     to despotism." [Emphasis added] U.S. Supreme Court  in 1866

     14  This State property was the collateral accepted by the
     creditors (foreign principals) so the federal government could
     borrow more Federal Reserve Notes (private bank credit) and keep
     operating under reorganization.  Roosevelt issued Executive Orders
     6073, 6102, 6111 and 6260.

     6073 issued on March 10, 1933,  called the "bank holiday" which
     closed the doors of the bankrupt government chartered banks (they
     were bankrupt as a whole).

     6102  issued on April 5, 1933,  prohibited "hoarding" gold and
     required people to turn it (their property) in to the Federal
     Reserve Banks (the creditors).

     6111 issued on April 20, 1933,  prohibited people from exporting
     gold (because now it wasn't theirs anymore).

     6260 issued on August 20, 1933,  combined 6102 and 6111.

     All this is totally unlawful unless someone other than the people
     owned the people's possessions. Yet, they were pledged to be
     surrendered if they needed to be, and they needed to be under the
     orders of the bankruptcy, and thereby deprived the people of their
     property under color of a contrived "emergency."

     15  These proclamations gave force to 470 provisions of Federal
     law.  These hundreds of statutes delegate to the President
     extraordinary powers, ordinarily exercised by the Congress, which
     affect the lives of American citizens in a host of
     all-encompassing manners.  This vast range of unconstitutional
     powers, taken together, confer enough authority to rule the
     country without reference to normal constitutional process.

     16  Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President
     may: seize property; organize and control the means of production;
     seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute
     martial law; seize and control all transportation and
     communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise;
     restrict travel; and in a plethora of particular ways, control the
     lives of all American citizens.  The several States were seduced
     into the new policy in 1939, with Roosevelt's promise of federal
     grants-in-aid.  Federal Revenue Sharing (31 U.S.C.  (  6700 et
     seq.) is the modern version of the grants-in-aid program.  In
     return for these grants, the states would agree to uphold and
     maintain the pledge of life, labor and property of their
     respective citizenry as surety for the debt obligations of the
     Federal government.  The politicians of these respective states
     gladly complied, because they viewed this as an opportunity to
     increase their own political power, letting the next generation of
     office holders worry over the long term consequences of their
     acts.

     17  On May 23, 1933, Congressman, Louis T. McFadden, brought
     formal charges against the Board of Governors of the Federal
     Reserve Bank system, the Comptroller of the Currency and the
     Secretary of the United States Treasury for numerous criminal
     acts, including but not limited to, CONSPIRACY, FRAUD, UNLAWFUL
     CONVERSION, AND TREASON.  The petition for Articles of Impeachment
     was thereafter referred to the Judiciary Committee, and has yet to
     be acted upon.  (See: the Congressional Record, May 23, 1933, pp.
     4055-4058.)

     18  Such persons fraudulently swore an Oath to uphold, defend and
     preserve the sovereignty of the Nation and several Republican
     States of the Union, and breached the Duty to protect the
     People/Citizens and their Posterity from fraud, imposition,
     avarice and stealthy encroachment.  (See: Atkins et al. vs. U.S.,
     556 F.2d 1028, pg. 1072, 1074, The Tempting Of America, supra,
     pgs. 155 - 159, also see, 5 U.S.C.A. 5305 & 5335, Senate Report
     No. 93-549, pgs.  69 - 71, C.R.S. 24-75-101)

     19  Such principles as "Fraud and Justice never dwell together"
     (Wingate's Maxims 680), and "A right of action cannot arise out of
     fraud." (Broom's maxims 297, 729; Cowper's Reports  343; 5 Scott's
     New Reports 558; 10  Mass.  276; 38 Fed. 800) These basic
     principles are too high of a thought concept, as is "Due Process",
     "Just Compensation" and Justice itself.  Honor is earned by
     honesty and integrity, not under false and fraudulent pretenses.
     The color of the cloth one wears will not cover-up the
     usurpations, lies, trickery and deceptions.

     20  In 1938, the whole country was bankrupted!  The creditors
     (foreign powers) seized ownership of the flag, State governments,
     their laws and constitutions, including every last comma and
     period, and the whole country and its citizens!  It placed us in
     peonage.  The 1937 Edition of the Book of the States openly
     declared that the people engaged in such activities as the
     Farming/Agro Related Industry had already been reduced to mere
     feudal "Tenants" on their Land, see the Book Of The States, Book
     II, Volume II, 1937, p 155.  It is the most humungous fraud ever
     perpetrated in human history. But  "government officials", both
     State and federal, went along with it, and continue to keep it all
     secret from the American people.

     21  In 1940, Congress passed the "Buck Act", (4 U.S.C.S. Sections
     105 113). In Section 110(e), the Act authorized any department of
     the federal government to create a "Federal area" for imposition
     of the "Public Salary Tax Act" of 1939. This tax is imposed at 4
     U.S.C.S. Sec. 111.  The Social Security Board had already created
     a "Federal area" overlay.

     22  Thus the obvious question arises: What is a "Federal area"? A
     "Federal area" is any area designated by any agency, department,
     or establishment of the federal government. This includes the
     Social Security areas designated by the Social Security
     Administration, any public housing area that has federal funding,
     a road that has federal funding, and almost everything that the
     federal government touches through any type of aid. (See
     Springfield v. Kenny, 104 N.E. 2d 65 (1951 App.)) This "Federal
     area" purportedly attaches to anyone who has a Social Security
     Number. Through this mechanism, the federal government usurped the
     Sovereignty of the People, as well as the Sovereignty of the
     several states, by creating "Federal areas" within the boundaries
     of the states under the purported authority of Article 4, Section
     3, Clause 2 (4:3:2) in the federal constitution.

     Therefore, all U.S. citizens [i.e. citizens of the District of
     Columbia] residing in one of the states of the Union, are
     classified as "property", as franchisees of the federal
     government, and as an "individual entity".  (See Wheeling Steel
     Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct.  773.

     23  Under the "Buck Act", (4 U.S.C.S. Sections 105-113), the
     federal government has created "Federal areas" within the
     boundaries of all the several States. These areas are similar to
     any territory that the federal government aquires through
     purchase, conquest or treaty, thereby imposing federal territorial
     law upon all people in these "federal areas". Federal territorial
     law is evidenced by the Executive Branch's yellow fringed U.S.
     flag displayed in schools and most courtrooms.

     24  In 1966, Congress being severely compromised, passed the
     "Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966, by  which the  entire taxing and
     monetary system i.e.  "Essential Engine" (See: Federalist Papers
     No. 31) was placed under  the Uniform Commercial Code. (See:
     Public Law 89-719, Legislative History, pg. 3722, also see, C.R.S.
     5-1- 106).

     25  The Uniform Commercial Code was, of course, promulgated by the
     National Conference of Commissioners On  Uniform State Laws in
     collusion with the American Law Institute for the "banking and
     business interests." (See: Handbook Of The National Conference of
     Commissioners On Uniform State Laws, (1966) Ed. pgs. 152 & 153).

     26   Things steadily grew worse and on March 28, 1970, President
     Nixon issued Proclamation No. 3972, declaring an "emergency"
     because the Postal Employees struck against the de facto
     government for higher pay, due to inflation of the paper "Bills of
     Credit."  (See: Senate Report No. 93-549, pg.  596)  Nixon placed
     the U.S. Postal Department under the control of the "Department of
     Defense."  (See: Department Of The Army Field Manual, FM 41-10
     (1969))

     27  The contrived "emergency" has created numerous abuses and
     usurpations, and abridgements of delegated Powers and Authority as
     stated in Senate Report 93-549:

     28  The statements heard in the Federal and State Tribunals, on
     numerous occasions, that Constitutional arguments are
     "immaterial", "frivolous" etc., is based upon concealment,
     furtherance and compounding of the frauds and "Emergency" created
     and sustained by the "Expatriated", ALIENS of the United Nations
     and its Organizations, Corporations and Associations.  (See:
     Letter, Insight Magazine, February 18, 1991, pg.  7, Lowell L.
     Flanders, President, U.N. Staff Union, New York) 8 U.S.C.A.  1481
     is one of the controlling statutes on expatriation as is 22
     U.S.C.A.  611 - 613 and 50 U.S.C.A. 781.

     29  This of course complies with "Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars",
     Research Technical Manual TM-SW7905.1, which discloses a
     declaration of war upon the American people.  (See: pg. 3 & 7).
     The Internal Revenue Service entered into a "service agreement"
     with the U.S. Treasury Department (See:  Public Law 94-564,
     Legislative History, pg. 5987, Reorganization Plan No. 26) and the
     Agency for International Development, pursuant to Treasury
     Delegation Order No.  91.  The Agency For International
     Development is an International paramilitary operation (See:
     Department Of The Army Field Manual, (1969) FM 41-10, pgs. 1-4,
     Sec. 1-7(b) & 1-6, Section 1- -10(7)(c)(1), 22 U.S.C.A. 284), and
     includes such activities as "Assumption of full or partial
     executive, legislative, and judicial authority over a  country or
     area." (See: FM 41-10, pg.  1-7, Section 110(7)(c)(4)) also see,
     Agreement Between The United Nations And The United States Of
     America Regarding The Headquarters Of The United Nations, Section
     7(d) & (8), 22 U.S.C.A.  287 (1979 Ed.) at pg. 241). It is to be
     further observed that the "Agreement" regarding the Headquarters
     District of the United Nations was NOT agreed to (See:
     Congressional Record - Senate, December 13, 1967, Mr. Thurmond),
     and is illegally in the Country in the first instant.

     30  The 1985 Edition of the Department Of Army Field Manual, FM 41
     10 further describes the  International "Civil Affairs"
     operations.  At page 3-6 it is admitted that the  Agency for
     International Development is autonomous and under direction of the
     International Development Cooperation Agency, and at page 3-8,
     that the operation is "paramilitary."  The International
     Organization(s) intents and purposes was to promote, implement and
     enforce a "DICTATORSHIP OVER FINANCE IN THE UNITED STATES." (See:
     Senate Report No. 93-549, pg. 186)

     It appears from the documentary evidence that the Internal Revenue
     Service Agents etc., are "Agents of a Foreign Principal" within
     the meaning and intent of the "Foreign Agents Registration Act of
     1938." They are directed and controlled by the corporate
     "Governor" of The Fund" a/k/a "Secretary of Treasury" (See: Public
     Law 94-564, supra, pg. 5942, U.S. Government Manual 1990/91, pgs.
     480 & 481, 26 U.S.C.A.  7701(a)(11), Treasury Delegation Order No.
     150-10), and the corporate "Governor" of "The Bank" 22 U.S.C.A.
     286 & 286a, acting as "information service employees 22 U.S.C.A.
     611(c)(ii), and have     been and do now "solicit, collect,
     disburse or dispense contribution (Tax - pecuniary contribution,
     Black's Law Dict. 5th ed.), loans, money or other things of value
     for or in interest of such foreign principal 22 U.S.C.A.
     611(c)(iii), and they entered into agreements     with a Foreign
     Principal pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order No. 91 i.e. the
     "Agency For International Development." (See: 22 U.S.C.A.
     611(c)(2))

     31  Among other reasons for lack of authority to act, such as a
     Foreign Agents Registration Statement, 22 U.S.C.A. 612 and 18
     U.S.C.A. 219 & 951, military authority cannot be imposed into
     civil affairs.  (See: Department Of The Army Pamphlet 27100- 70,
     Military Law Review, Vol. 70)

     32  An unelected, unrepresentative, unaccountable oligarchy of
     expatriates and aliens, who fraudulently claim that they intend to
     establish "rational and equitable international economic
     relations", yet openly  declared that they no longer "stabilize
     the value of the dollar" nor "assure the value of the coin and
     currency of  the United States" is purely misrepresentation,
     deceit and fraud. (See: Public Law 95-147, 91 Stat. 1227, at pg.
     1229)

     This was augmented by Public Law 101-167, 103 Stat.  1195, which
     discloses massive appropriations of rehypothecated debt credit for
     the general welfare and common defense of  other Foreign Powers,
     including  "Communist" countries or satellites, International
     control of  natural and human resources, etc.  etc.. A "Resource"
     is a claim of "property" and when related to people constitutes
     "slavery."

     33  The covert procedure used to implement and enforce these
     Foreign Constitutions, Laws, Procedures, Rules, Regulations, etc.,
     has not yet been fully collected and assimilated nor presented as
     evidence to establish seditious collusion and conspiracy.  Our
     patience and tolerance for those who pervert the very necessary
     and basic foundations of society has been pushed to insufferable
     levels.  They have "fundamentally" changed the form and substance
     of the de jure Republican form of Government guaranteed to each
     State under Article 4, Sec. 4 of the U.S. Constitution, exhibited
     a willful and wanton disregard for the Rights, Safety and Property
     of others, evinced a despotic design to reduce the people to
     slavery, peonage and involuntary servitude, under a fraudulent,
     tyrannical, seditious foreign oligarchy, with intent and purpose
     to institute, erect and form a "Dictatorship" over all Citizens
     and their Posterity.

     34  Pactions, Confederations, and Alliances, and under pretense of
     "emergency", which they themselves created, promoted and
     furthered, formed a multitude of offices and retained those of
     alien allegiance to perpetuate their frauds and to eat out the
     substance of the good and productive people of this Land. They
     have trespassed on our Lives, Liberties, Properties and Families
     and endangered our Peace, Safety, Welfare and Dignity.

				 LAWBREAKING

     35  In the field of law we got removal of federal common law with
     the Erie Railroad Co. v Tompkins case, 304 US 64; and the
     hodgepodging of the jurisdictions of Law and Equity together,
     which is known as "One Form Of Action"; as two of the main
     insanities dictated by the new owners.  Law and Equity does not
     mix any better than oil and water.

     36  Sometime between 1958 and 1970 admiralty was mixed in with the
     "One Form of Action" "civil actions".  (See Rule 1 in the 1958 and
     1970 Editions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in Title 28
     United States Code.)

     37  In Federalist Paper No. 83 Hamilton expressed, "My
     convictions are equally strong that great advantages result from
     the separation of the equity and the law jurisdiction ..."  The
     Constitution establishes the three jurisdictions as separate in
     Article III.

     38  There is no Constitutional authority for operating in
     bankruptcy under Martial Law/Rule.  The legislative, executive,
     and judicial branches no longer exist, as the de jure government
     has fraudulently been dissolved and the entire country has been
     received in bankruptcy by the Fund (IMF) and World Bank through a
     series of "emergency war powers" acts.

     39  The intent and objective of the bankruptcy was not to resolve
     any "emergency"; it was to create one for the express purpose of
     changing the governmental, social, economic and industrial
     character of the de jure society, to infringe and abrogate
     inalienable Rights, steal and alienate the birth Rights of the
     People, impair the obligations of honest contracts, to defraud and
     obtain a benefit therefrom, create turbulence and contention,
     overthrow, and to establish a corrupt totalitarian oligarchy and
     combination, in direct contravention to the Law of the Land, and
     against the Peace, Dignity and Security of We The People (the real
     State).

     40  Because the States also are now bankrupt entities means that
     now not even the (de facto) State courts have any sovereignty; no
     enforceable jurisdiction, and can only invite participants into
     court!  State courts are now only courts of mediation.  Fines
     collected by these courts go to the Federal Reserve Banks, the
     depository agents for the Fund and the Bank.  Thus, administrative
     agents in this State are also acting as trustees and agents for
     foreign principals, and are required to register as such.

			DE FACTO OPERATIONS

     41  IF "public officials" represent the people under the
     Constitution, they can only collect, use, and be paid in
     Constitutional money, gold and silver. And they can only operate
     at common law in all criminal matters except for Maritime
     contracts.

     42  Federal Reserve Banks are private banks; check the government
     and private pages of the telephone  book to see where they are
     listed. IF "public officials" use Federal Reserve "Notes," or
     funds reducible only to Federal Reserve "Notes" in public
     business, they are using non-redeemable,  dishonored, impaired,
     depreciated, rehypothecated, interagency, international bills of
     debt/credit, and  have to be operating only a de facto government,
     which is treason to their oaths of office and  violations of their
     agency obligations to the sovereign people, and in this case, for
     foreign principals.

     "A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong  gives it a
     superficial appearance of being right."   Thomas Paine

     43  It is a clearly established principle of law that a
     corporation being incorporeal and a creature of the law must be
     represented by an attorney. An attorney representing an artificial
     entity, such as the (de facto) State of  Connecticut, must appear
     with the corporate charter and law in his hand. A person acting as
     an attorney for a foreign principal must be registered pursuant to
     the Foreign Agents Registration Act (22 USC Section 612 et seq.).
     See Victor Rabinowitz et. al. v Robert F. Kennedy 376 US 605.

     44  Failure to file said "Foreign Agents Registrations Statement"
     goes directly to the jurisdiction, and lack of standing to be
     before the court, and is a felony pursuant to 18 USC þþ 219, &
     951.  The conflict of law, interest and allegiance is obvious. "NO
     MAN CAN SERVE TWO MASTERS." See Bible, Luke 16:13, Jeffery v
     Pounds, 67 Cal.App.3d 6,  Cinema 5 v Cinerama 528 F 2d 1384, Easly
     v Brookline Trust 256 SW 2d  983.

     45  In US v Woodly 726 F 2d 1328 and 751 F 2d 1008, it is ruled
     that a judge who can be influenced by another Department or
     others, is not an Article III de jure judge.  And in US v Ferreira
     13 How 42 it is ruled  that a judge who can be influenced by
     another (not independent), is only a commissioner under a treaty.
     There is no authority under the Constitution for Statutory
     Administrative courts.

     "We (Courts) have no more right to decline the exercise of
     jurisdiction which is given, than to  usurp that  which is not
     given.  The one or the other would be treason to the
     Constitution."  (Emphasis added) Cohen v Virginia 6 Wheat 264

     "In all Cases ... in which a State shall be a Party ... the
     supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction ..." Article 3,
     Section 2, U.S. Constitution.

     46  Judges who pretend judicial power without really having it,
     and when they act for  foreign principals,  violate 18 USC þþ 219
     and 951.

			    UNSECURED DEBT

     47  This Affiant did not give permission to ANYONE to pledge his
     life, liberty, body, property, and labor for someone else's
     benefit, i.e., the federal government's debt. By federal
     government is meant that totally bankrupt, functionally dead at
     law, foreign municipal corporation domiciled in Washington, D.C.
     called the "United States"

     "... the United States is to be regarded as a body politic and
     corporate.  ... It is suggested that the United States is to be
     regarded as a domestic corporation, so far as the State of New
     York is concerned.  We think this contention has no support in
     reason or authority. ...  The United States is a foreign
     corporation in relation to a State." [Emphasis added] in re
     Merriam's Estate, 36 NE 505, 506 22.

     That the pledge was made anyway is fraud, because no one asked
     this Affiant his permission or even told him about it. Security
     for a debt can never be lawfully obtained by fraud.  "Fraud
     vitiates the most solemn contracts. documents and even  judgments"
     U.S. v Throckmorton, 98 US 426

			FOREIGN AGENTS IN CHARGE!

     48  The de facto "State" engages in activities forbidden to the de
     jure State by collusion with the Internationals pursuant to 26 IRC
     6103(k)(5) under the pretense of the "Intergovernmental Personnel
     Act", acting as the "FedState Team."  The FedState Team is under
     the direction and control of the Assistant Commissioner
     (INTERNATIONAL).  See Internal Revenue Manual Section 1132.61
     Pages 1100-40.1 through 1100-40.2 (1992 Edition) and FedState
     Bulletins -Commissioner's Advisory Group Meeting September 24 & 25
     Minutes.

     49  The State government is supposed to protect it's citizens from
     excesses by federal government personnel, and likewise the federal
     government is supposed to protect us from excesses by State
     government personnel.  But the internationalist's aim IS excesses
     and subjugation, so this "FedState Team" establishes cooperation
     between all government personnel working not for the people, but
     for foreign principals.

     50  A municipal court is no more than a collection agent for the
     creditors of what used to be OUR governments.  The institutions
     now functioning as the government are merely the alter ego of the
     Fund and the Bank.  These foreign entities are operating illegally
     in this country by pretending to be the government for the people,
     and is what the U.S. Supreme Court tacitly describes as
     "cooperative federalism".

     51  "Public officials" who under false and fraudulent pretenses
     and colors of authority engage in soliciting and collecting
     information, contributions, loans, money, or other things of value
     for or in the interest of their foreign principals, and being
     directly or indirectly subsidized, directed, controlled, or
     financed by said foreign powers, and while deceitfully and
     secretly agreeing to conceal their true character and true
     principal were and are engaged in promoting and furthering the
     principles and doctrines of One World Government, and the
     dissolution of the several States united.  Such promotion
     constitutes the revival of the ancient pagan and evil Roman Civil
     Law under which our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, was crucified,
     and under which Christians were thrown to the lions.

     52  All "public officials" in this State, acting as trustees for
     foreign principals, at all times heretofore and herein were agents
     for foreign principals as defined in 22 USC 611, namely The Fund
     (IMF), and The Bank. As such they are required to file a foreign
     agents registration statement form and supplements thereto,
     pursuant to 22 USC 612, and are not exempt pursuant to 22 USC 613,
     see Rabinowitz v Robert Kennedy 376 US 605.

     53  Acting under false and fraudulent pretenses as officers and
     officials of the de jure government of Connecticut is a violation
     of the Penal Code  if the "official" intends to induce another to
     submit to his pretended official authority.  This would also be a
     violation of the victim's civil rights under Title 42 USC 1983.

				 TREASON

     54  By continuing to administer this perfidy, "public officials"
     are committing treason against not only the Constitution, but
     against truth, rightness, and the real Sovereigns of the nation --
     We the People.

     "There is no position which depends on clearer principle than that
     every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the
     commission under which it is exercised is void. No legislative
     act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid.  To
     deny this would be to affirm that the deputy is greater than his
     principal; that the servant is above the master; that the
     representatives of  the people are superior to the people
     themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers may do not only
     what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid."
     Federalist Paper No. 78 Alexander Hamilton

		       WAR & EMERGENCY POWERS

     55  Research is pouring in at an outrageous rate. The cat is out
     of the bag. All across America people are becoming aware of this
     fraud being perpetrated upon them by de facto "public officials"
     who continue to administer this perfidy -- typical examples are:

     From a Resolution Adopted by unanimous vote on June 17, 1995, by
     the Republican Party of Texas State Executive Committee: "Whereas
     there has occurred continuous breach of trust, duty  and
     obligation imposed under  authority of the Constitution of the
     United States of America, resulting in a continued  abridgement of
     the Rights, Privileges, Immunities, and Liberties of Citizens and
     others, all committed under pretense of a continuing national
     crisis and furtherance of emergency conditions; and

     "Whereas, our forefathers recognizing these same conditions  wrote
     to the British Parliament and King of Great Britain in the
     Declaration of Rights of 1774:

     "Whereas, since the close of the last war, the British
     Parliament, claiming a power of right  to bind the people of
     America, by statute, in all cases whatsoever, hath in   some acts
     expressly imposed taxes on them, and in others, under various
     pretenses, but in fact for  the purpose of raising a revenue, hath
     imposed rates and duties payable in these colonies established a
     board of commissioners, with unconstitutional powers, and extended
     the jurisdiction of courts of admiralty, not only for collecting
     the said duties, but for the trial of causes merely arising within
     the body of a country ...

     "Today under pretence of emergency and reorganization the mischief
     has been recreated and reinstituted within the Nation and several
     States of the Union, and has once again left the people without
     any plain, speedy or adequate remedy, and is wholly contrary to
     the true original extent and end of the Union and civil Government
     as ordained and established by the people; ..." [Emphasis Added]

     From a Resolution of the California Republican Assembly adopted on
     March 26, 1995 Number 395.1

     "Resolved: The California Republican Assembly at the Annual
     Convention in San Diego, March 26, 1995 does hereby determine to
     inform members of State and federal elected and appointed offices
     that the United States of America is presently under War and
     Emergency Powers and has been for 62 [64] years; be it further

     "Resolved: That the California Republican Assembly will support
     only men and women who are willing to become aware of the
     usurpation of the power of the United States Constitution and who
     are committed to restoring our Constitution to its rightful place
     as the Supreme Law of the Land." [Emphasis added] There are
     numerous other examples that could be cited here. But,  it is
     enough to say that this Affiant is far from being alone in his
     concern for the State of affairs that has developed under the
     fraudulent and contrived national "emergency" and the Martial
     Law/Rule that has been secretly imposed upon them without their
     knowledge or informed consent.





Next Page of the Law Suit Document

Go Back to Money Home Page.